[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240306234100.10356-1-Maxim.Moskalets@kaspersky.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:41:00 +0300
From: Maxim Moskalets <maximmosk4@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Maxim.Moskalets@...persky.com,
bristot@...hat.com,
bsegall@...gle.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com,
mgorman@...e.de,
mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
vschneid@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] kernel/sched: use seq_putc instead of seq_puts
Using seq_putc for newline characters is faster and more appropriate
than seq_puts, since only one character is passed and there is no need
to use a more powerful and less fast function
Signed-off-by: Maxim Moskalets <Maxim.Moskalets@...persky.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
index 0de9dda09949..54d9dd68f517 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int __cpuacct_percpu_seq_show(struct seq_file *m,
percpu = cpuacct_cpuusage_read(ca, i, index);
seq_printf(m, "%llu ", (unsigned long long) percpu);
}
- seq_printf(m, "\n");
+ seq_putc(m, '\n');
return 0;
}
@@ -245,14 +245,14 @@ static int cpuacct_all_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *V)
seq_puts(m, "cpu");
for (index = 0; index < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; index++)
seq_printf(m, " %s", cpuacct_stat_desc[index]);
- seq_puts(m, "\n");
+ seq_putc(m, '\n');
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
seq_printf(m, "%d", cpu);
for (index = 0; index < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; index++)
seq_printf(m, " %llu",
cpuacct_cpuusage_read(ca, cpu, index));
- seq_puts(m, "\n");
+ seq_putc(m, '\n');
}
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists