linux-kernel - Re: CVE-2023-52572: cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024030635-alibi-obtrusive-133e@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:45:33 +0000
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Robert Frohl <rfrohl@...e.de>
Cc: Red Hat Product Security <secalert@...hat.com>, security@...e.de,
	cve@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-52572: cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread()

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:23:37AM +0100, Robert Frohl wrote:
> On 06.03.24 10:16, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:30:08AM -0800, Red Hat Product Security wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello Robert,
> > >   Thank you for reaching to Red Hat Product Security.
> > >   I have reviewed the flaws, CVE-2023-1192 has the correct patch used in the reference.
> > 
> > What do you mean by "reference"?
> > 
> > CVE-2023-1192 points to a patch for a totally different filesystem
> > (ntfs3).  Will that be fixed?
> 
> This is also stated in the RH bugzilla, that the initial patch was wrong:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154178#c28

Ok, so what will RH be doing here?

confused,

greg k-h