[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84949c3f-ed90-4c88-89d8-eab66025f8d3@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:53:03 +0100
From: Robert Frohl <rfrohl@...e.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Red Hat Product Security <secalert@...hat.com>, security@...e.de,
cve@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-52572: cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread()
On 06.03.24 10:45, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:23:37AM +0100, Robert Frohl wrote:
>> On 06.03.24 10:16, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:30:08AM -0800, Red Hat Product Security wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Robert,
>>>> Thank you for reaching to Red Hat Product Security.
>>>> I have reviewed the flaws, CVE-2023-1192 has the correct patch used in the reference.
>>>
>>> What do you mean by "reference"?
>>>
>>> CVE-2023-1192 points to a patch for a totally different filesystem
>>> (ntfs3). Will that be fixed?
>>
>> This is also stated in the RH bugzilla, that the initial patch was wrong:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154178#c28
>
> Ok, so what will RH be doing here?
>
> confused,
I hope that the additional information will help to update the published
information.
The bug states that the initial patch was wrong, but it looks like it
just was never updated/fixed in the published information for CVE-2023-1192.
Cheers,
Robert
--
Security Engineer, SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße
146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner
Knoblich (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
GPG: D29F 82AA 9FD5 9D6E 74B1 6370 089E DB3D 230A 2404
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0x089EDB3D230A2404.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (11850 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists