linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] w1: gpio: A set of cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:57:01 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] w1: gpio: A set of cleanups

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 06:12:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 06:43:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:38:54PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

..

> > > I wonder about your choice of recipients. I would have added Krzysztof
> > > to To and me at most to Cc:.
> > 
> > It's automatically generated using get_maintainers.pl.
> > See details in the source of the script [1] I'm using.
> > 
> > [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh
> 
> Getting something wrong automatically isn't an excuse for getting it
> wrong :-)

I'm not sure why you think it's wrong. You worked on the code lately and Git
heuristics considered that over threshold of 67%.

> That scripts has:
> 
> to=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-m --no-r)
> cc=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-l)
> 
> I recommend to swap the values for to and cc here to make sure you have
> the maintainer in $to and the relevant lists in $cc.

Hmm... I don't remember why I put it this way.

Btw, you are the first one for the entire life cycle of that script (3 years?)
who complains about such details... So, patches are welcome! :-)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko