linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] w1: gpio: A set of cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <spc5otfv7s2wtunhbxdorm5bh5snvfbggoaqghowrxm2osbeoz@b2dsqa3amvtg>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:56:20 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] w1: gpio: A set of cleanups

Hello Andy,

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:57:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 06:12:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 06:43:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:38:54PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > I wonder about your choice of recipients. I would have added Krzysztof
> > > > to To and me at most to Cc:.
> > > 
> > > It's automatically generated using get_maintainers.pl.
> > > See details in the source of the script [1] I'm using.
> > > 
> > > [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh
> > 
> > Getting something wrong automatically isn't an excuse for getting it
> > wrong :-)
> 
> I'm not sure why you think it's wrong. You worked on the code lately and Git
> heuristics considered that over threshold of 67%.

When I send a patch I send it "to" the maintainers, because it's them
who I want an action from. This also matches the semantic of M: in
MAINTAINERS which requests to use these contaces in "To:".

> > That scripts has:
> > 
> > to=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-m --no-r)
> > cc=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-l)
> > 
> > I recommend to swap the values for to and cc here to make sure you have
> > the maintainer in $to and the relevant lists in $cc.

Thinking again, this is wrong. I'd recommend:

	to=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-r --no-l)
	cc=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-m)

> Btw, you are the first one for the entire life cycle of that script (3 years?)
> who complains about such details... So, patches are welcome! :-)

I won't do more than the above hint here.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)