| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqtPRfe1VL_ACYEOSq=iNMkZ03-fwVv3XdVrpTObZFu1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:31:06 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm-bridge: it66121: Use fwnode API to acquire
device properties
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 19:24, Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> Make this driver less DT-dependent by calling the freshly created helpers,
> should be no functional changes for DT based systems. But open the door for
> otherwise use cases. Even though there is no user emerged yet, this still
> do no harms. In fact, we reduce some boilerplate across drm bridge drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c
> index 1c3433b5e366..a2cf2be86065 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> -#include <linux/of_graph.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> @@ -1480,7 +1479,7 @@ static int it66121_audio_codec_init(struct it66121_ctx *ctx, struct device *dev)
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>
> - if (!of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "#sound-dai-cells")) {
> + if (!fwnode_property_present(dev_fwnode(dev), "#sound-dai-cells")) {
> dev_info(dev, "No \"#sound-dai-cells\", no audio\n");
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1503,13 +1502,37 @@ static const char * const it66121_supplies[] = {
> "vcn33", "vcn18", "vrf12"
> };
>
> +static int it66121_read_bus_width(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 port,
> + u32 *bus_width)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint;
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + endpoint = fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id(fwnode, port, 0, 0);
> + if (!endpoint)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(endpoint, "bus-width", &val);
> + fwnode_handle_put(endpoint);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (val != 12 && val != 24)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *bus_width = val;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int it66121_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> u32 revision_id, vendor_ids[2] = { 0 }, device_ids[2] = { 0 };
> - struct device_node *ep;
> int ret;
> struct it66121_ctx *ctx;
> struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
>
> if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
> dev_err(dev, "I2C check functionality failed.\n");
> @@ -1520,37 +1543,23 @@ static int it66121_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (!ctx)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - ep = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(dev->of_node, 0, 0);
> - if (!ep)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> ctx->dev = dev;
> ctx->client = client;
> ctx->info = i2c_get_match_data(client);
>
> - of_property_read_u32(ep, "bus-width", &ctx->bus_width);
> - of_node_put(ep);
> -
> - if (ctx->bus_width != 12 && ctx->bus_width != 24)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - ep = of_graph_get_remote_node(dev->of_node, 1, -1);
> - if (!ep) {
> - dev_err(ctx->dev, "The endpoint is unconnected\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - if (!of_device_is_available(ep)) {
> - of_node_put(ep);
> - dev_err(ctx->dev, "The remote device is disabled\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> + /* Endpoint of port@0 contains the bus-width property */
> + ret = it66121_read_bus_width(fwnode, 0, &ctx->bus_width);
There is no need to pass port as an argument to that function.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - ctx->next_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(ep);
> - of_node_put(ep);
> + ctx->next_bridge = drm_bridge_find_next_bridge_by_fwnode(fwnode, 1);
> if (!ctx->next_bridge) {
> dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Next bridge not found, deferring probe\n");
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + } else if (IS_ERR(ctx->next_bridge)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->next_bridge);
> + dev_err(dev, "Error in founding the next bridge: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
Nit: I'd usually expect this part to be in a different order: first
check for error, then check for absence. But that's a minor thing.
> }
>
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, ctx);
> @@ -1584,9 +1593,9 @@ static int it66121_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> }
>
> ctx->bridge.funcs = &it66121_bridge_funcs;
> - ctx->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
> ctx->bridge.type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_HDMIA;
> ctx->bridge.ops = DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT | DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID | DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD;
> + drm_bridge_set_node(&ctx->bridge, fwnode);
>
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq, NULL, it66121_irq_threaded_handler,
> IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), ctx);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists