lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:13:01 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: add 1.2GHz CPU Frequency

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 12:02, Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi, Dmitry
> > So... Do you consider this SoC to be IPQ6018 or IPQ6000?
>
> According to the chip silk screen, this is ipq6000. In addition, I have
> never seen a board with the SoC chip silk screen printed as ipq6018.

Hmm, then what kind of chips do you consider to be ipq6018 if you
haven't seen it on a silkscreen?

>
> > And anyway, this should be explained in the commit message. Otherwise
> > anybody reading the commit will have the same questions as I do.
>
> Sorry, I will explain this in more detail.
>
> Thanks,
> Chukun
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ