linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: hwmon: tda38640: Add interrupt & regulator properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABqG17h5fU4nueaz235XXjJwuPJoLmjo3fs-xZ5mFjtGGYQFkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:43:09 +0530
From: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, 
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	mazziesaccount@...il.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: hwmon: tda38640: Add interrupt &
 regulator properties

Hi,


On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 00:08, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 03:20:02PM +0530, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 12:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/03/2024 22:07, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > > > Add properties for interrupt & regulator.
> > > > Also update example.
> > >
> > > Nothing improved.
> > Yes, Just aligned the regulator node name in this revision.
> > I missed aligning the commit message.
> >
> > I'll fix in next revision & update commit message as:
> >
> > tda38640 has a single regulator output along with
> > CAT_FAULT# pin to report internal events.
> > Hence add properties for regulator & interrupt.
> >
> > Let me know if any others changes needed.
>
> That should be fine - but your line wrapping is really odd, you can make
> use of 72 characters but you are wrapping at ~50.
Sure. Will push another revision with the changes.

Thanks & Regards,
Naresh