[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZetgiaZ1+wt5lCkB@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:01:29 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc: update max
interrupt numbers
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 12:11:03PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 10:30:51AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > fsl,imx8qxp-spdif and fsl,imx8qm-spdif have 2 interrupts. Other platforms
> > have 1 interrupt.
> >
> > Increase max interrupt number to 2 and add restriction for platforms except
> > i.MX8QXP and i.MX8QM.
> >
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml
> > index 56f8c0c8afdea..a242f68f99f18 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml
> > @@ -31,7 +31,11 @@ properties:
> > maxItems: 1
> >
> > interrupts:
> > - maxItems: 1
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 2
> > + items:
> > + - description: Combined or receive interrupt
> > + - description: Transmit interrupt
>
> Test your patches please because this will have warnings. Or, you can
> put in *exactly* what I provided because this is not it.
>
> If you continue to just toss crap at us at the rate you are, the DT
> maintainers will either just start ignoring your patches or require some
> trusted review by another NXP colleague first (offhand, not sure who
> that would be which is part of the problem).
Sorry, I run wrong command to check another dtb file. So have not catch
this problem.
Frank
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists