linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-sai: allow only one dma-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZethoKhsUZ08HHL0@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:06:08 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-sai: allow only one
 dma-names

On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:58:16PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 10:30:52AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > Some sai only connect one direction dma (rx/tx) in SOC. For example:
> > imx8qxp sai5 only connect tx dma channel. So allow only one "rx" or "tx"
> > for dma-names.
> > 
> > Remove description under dmas because no user use index to get dma channel.
> > All user use 'dma-names' to get correct dma channel. dma-names already in
> > 'required' list.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> 
> Please drop my ack from this, this isn't the patch I acked originally
> and we were having a conversation as recently as yesterday on v4 about
> this patch because Rob didn't like this approach. His suggestion is
> better than the one I gave on v4 that you have used here.

Why do you think Rob don't like this approach? He just said this is 3rd
method. And it is simple enough and match all restriction.

Frank Li

> 
> Please give it a few days between resubmissions, and do not send new
> versions of a series every day. It is very confusing to have different
> conversions on three versions of this patch in my inbox all at the same
> time.

Okay, I think it is just simple fix and almost everything already close to
settle down.

Frank

> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.
> 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml | 8 +++-----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > index 2456d958adeef..93e7737a49a7b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > @@ -81,15 +81,13 @@ properties:
> >  
> >    dmas:
> >      minItems: 1
> > -    items:
> > -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for RX
> > -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
> > +    maxItems: 2
> >  
> >    dma-names:
> >      minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 2
> >      items:
> > -      - const: rx
> > -      - const: tx
> > +      enum: [ rx, tx ]
> >  
> >    interrupts:
> >      items:
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> >