lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89d6a820-d510-4549-8097-76670fa36e6a@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:38:10 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: timer: mediatek: Convert to json-schema

Il 07/03/24 19:15, Rob Herring ha scritto:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 7:29 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Convert the MediaTek SoC timer txt binding to json-schema.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/timer/mediatek,mtk-timer.txt     | 47 ----------
>>   .../bindings/timer/mediatek,timer.yaml        | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/mediatek,mtk-timer.txt
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/mediatek,timer.yaml
> 
> Looks like this never got applied. I've applied it now and added 8365
> which got added to the .txt binding in the mean time. I'm not sure
> it's right though. The txt binding says it was CPUX timer, but the dts
> says otherwise. The 6795 dts looks wrong. It says the timer is CPUX
> and GPT timer. That warning remains.
> 

Thanks. This one got totally forgotten, yes.

By the way, I'll recheck the 6795 DT as soon as possible.

Cheers!
Angelo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ