linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: dts: marvell: Add 7-segment LED display on x530

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8177b94d-82c9-42b6-85eb-728dec762162@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:18:54 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
 "Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc: "Chris Packham" <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
 "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@...nel.org>,
 "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>,
 "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
 "Lee Jones" <lee@...nel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: dts: marvell: Add 7-segment LED display on x530

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 10:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:36 AM Gregory CLEMENT
> <gregory.clement@...tlin.com> wrote:
>>
>> Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> writes:
>>
>> > The Allied Telesis x530 products have a 7-segment LED display which is
>> > used for node identification when the devices are stacked. Represent
>> > this as a gpio-7-segment device.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
>>
>> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
>>
>> Normally, this patch should be taken in mvebu and then merged by
>> arm-soc. However, I haven't seen any other patch touching this file (so
>> no risk of merge conflict) and I think it's too late for me to make a
>> new pull request to arm-soc. So I'm not against it being taken with the
>> rest of the patches. However, I think it would be a good idea to see
>> what Arnd thinks about it.
>
> Arnd wasn't Cc'ed, now I added him.

I already have a 'late' branch for stuff that for some reason
was too late be part of the normal pull requests but should
still make it into 6.9. If this one is important, I don't
mind taking it.

On the other hand, from the patch description this one doesn't
seem that urgent, so I don't see much harm in delaying it
to v6.10, and using the normal process for it.

     Arnd