linux-kernel - Re: regression/bisected/6.8 commit 5d390df3bdd13d178eb2e02e60e9a480f7103f7b prevents the system going into suspend mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65081fe0-cd4a-4168-90b3-7559357d3b55@p183>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:02:57 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
Cc: stfrench@...rosoft.com,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression/bisected/6.8 commit
 5d390df3bdd13d178eb2e02e60e9a480f7103f7b prevents the system going into
 suspend mode

On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 05:48:04PM +0500, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:15 AM Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > What? Deleting unused defines breaks suspend?
> >
> > Collect fs/smb/client/smbencrypt.o with and without patch and
> > see them being identical.
> >
> > Enum in stddef.h are
> >
> >         enum {
> >                 false = 0,
> >                 true = 1,
> >         };
> >
> > so if defines were used somehow they would expand to same values of
> > same type.
> >
> > Something else is going on.
> 
> I understand your confusion.
> But I didn't come up with it. And moreover, I saw what the revert does.
 
> Why did this really help is a question to which I would like to find an answer.

OK, lets exclude newbie mistakes.

Exclude CIFS:

* start with clean compile into out-of-tree directory

	mkdir ../obj-001
	cp .config ../obj-001/.config
	make -k -j$(nproc) O=../obj-001		# buggy kernel
	sudo rm -rf /lib/modules/$(uname -r)	# no mixed module copies
	sudo make O=../obj-001 modules_install
	sudo make O=../obj-001 install

	[patch]

	mkdir ../obj-002
		...

This is what I use in Production(tm):

	#!/bin/sh -x
	sudo rm -rf /lib/modules/$(uname -r)            &&\
	sudo make modules_install                       &&\
	sudo make install                               &&\
	sudo emerge @module-rebuild                     &&\
	sudo grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg       &&\
	sync                                            &&\
	sudo nvme flush /dev/nvme*n1

* After rebooting double check that build number in /proc/version
  matches .version in the ../obj directory:

	$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 6.7.4-100.fc38.x86_64 (mockbuild@...bdffd8a2b4619991006cfcbec2871) (gcc (GCC) 13.2.1 20231011 (Red Hat 13.2.1-4), GNU ld version 2.39-16.fc38) [[[[[ ===> #1 <===  ]]]]] SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb  5 22:19:06 UTC 2024

	$ cat ../obj/.version
	1

This verifies that you've rebooted into correct kernel.

* keep both full kernel trees in two separate directories

	if both vmlinux are identical, you may try to find which modules
	are different

* disassemble fs/smb/client/smbencrypt.o or (cifs.ko) for both kernels

	objdump -M intel -dr $(find ../obj-001 -type f -name cifs.ko) >000.s
	objdump -M intel -dr $(find ../obj-002 -type f -name cifs.ko) >001.s
	diff -u0 000.s 001.s

For your experiment, number should be 1 (first clean recompile from
scratch) and then 2 (after applying 1 patch).

If the bug is not 100% reproducible, then bisecting gets more
entertaining because you can't be really sure each step is in the right
direction.

> The most interesting thing is that I have two identical systems:
> Identical:
> - M/B - MSI MPG B650I EDGE WIFI
> - CPU - AMD Ryzen 7950x
> - GPU - AMD Radeon 7900XTX
> - SSD1 for system - Intel Optane 905P SSDPE21D480GAM3
> - SSD2 for data - Intel D5 P5316 Series SSDPF2NV307TZN1
> - PSU - Asus ROG LOKI SFX-L 1000W Platinum
> - Mouse - Logitech MX Master 3s
> - Keyboard - MX Keys Mini
> - Linux distro (identical version of all software) - Fedora Rawhide
> On one system this bug is present, on the other it is not.
> 
> Affected system: https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=9a5a8c0338
> Not affected system: https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=37c62300bb