[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240308210121.0c6a33f9@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:01:21 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Jesse Brandeburg
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marek
Behún <kabel@...nel.org>, Piergiorgio Beruto
<piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 05/13] net: ethtool: Allow passing a phy
index for some commands
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:10:01 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> +``ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX`` identify the ethernet PHY the message relates to.
identifies
Ethernet
> +As there are numerous commands that are related to PHY configuration, and because
> +we can have more than one PHY on the link, the PHY index can be passed in the
we can have -> there may be
> +request for the commands that needs it. It is however not mandatory, and if it
commas around however
> +is not passed for commands that target a PHY, the net_device.phydev pointer
> +is used, as a fallback that keeps the legacy behaviour.
s/ that keeps the legacy behaviour// feels more like a default than
legacy TBH
> @@ -104,7 +124,7 @@ int ethnl_parse_header_dev_get(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info,
> /* No validation here, command policy should have a nested policy set
> * for the header, therefore validation should have already been done.
> */
> - ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, ARRAY_SIZE(ethnl_header_policy) - 1, header,
> + ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, ARRAY_SIZE(ethnl_header_policy_phy) - 1, header,
> NULL, extack);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -145,6 +165,26 @@ int ethnl_parse_header_dev_get(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (dev) {
> + if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX]) {
> + u32 phy_index = nla_get_u32(tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX]);
> +
> + phydev = phy_link_topo_get_phy(dev->link_topo,
> + phy_index);
> + if (!phydev) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, header,
> + "no phy matches phy index");
> + return -EINVAL;
You can drop the msg, and use ENODEV?
Also point at the index, not header:
struct nl_attr *phyid;
phyid = tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX];
phydev = phy_link_topo_get_phy(dev->link_topo,
nla_get_u32(phyid));
if (!...
NL_SET_ERR_ATTR(extack, phyid);
return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* If we need a PHY but no phy index is specified, fallback
> + * to dev->phydev
> + */
> + phydev = dev->phydev;
> + }
> + }
else if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX]) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR("can't target a PHY without a netdev")
...
? just in case someone calls this with _phy policy and no dev required?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists