linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v10 05/13] net: ethtool: Allow passing a phy index for some commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:01:21 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew@...n.ch>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
 <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit
 <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
 Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Jesse Brandeburg
 <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marek
 Behún <kabel@...nel.org>, Piergiorgio Beruto
 <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
 Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman
 <horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 05/13] net: ethtool: Allow passing a phy
 index for some commands

On Mon,  4 Mar 2024 16:10:01 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> +``ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX`` identify the ethernet PHY the message relates to.

identifies
Ethernet

> +As there are numerous commands that are related to PHY configuration, and because
> +we can have more than one PHY on the link, the PHY index can be passed in the

we can have -> there may be

> +request for the commands that needs it. It is however not mandatory, and if it

commas around however

> +is not passed for commands that target a PHY, the net_device.phydev pointer
> +is used, as a fallback that keeps the legacy behaviour.

s/ that keeps the legacy behaviour// feels more like a default than
legacy TBH

> @@ -104,7 +124,7 @@ int ethnl_parse_header_dev_get(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info,
>  	/* No validation here, command policy should have a nested policy set
>  	 * for the header, therefore validation should have already been done.
>  	 */
> -	ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, ARRAY_SIZE(ethnl_header_policy) - 1, header,
> +	ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, ARRAY_SIZE(ethnl_header_policy_phy) - 1, header,
>  			       NULL, extack);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -145,6 +165,26 @@ int ethnl_parse_header_dev_get(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (dev) {
> +		if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX]) {
> +			u32 phy_index = nla_get_u32(tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX]);
> +
> +			phydev = phy_link_topo_get_phy(dev->link_topo,
> +						       phy_index);
> +			if (!phydev) {
> +				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, header,
> +						    "no phy matches phy index");
> +				return -EINVAL;

You can drop the msg, and use ENODEV?
Also point at the index, not header:

			struct nl_attr *phyid;

			phyid = tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX];
			phydev = phy_link_topo_get_phy(dev->link_topo,
						       nla_get_u32(phyid));
			if (!...
				NL_SET_ERR_ATTR(extack, phyid);
				return -ENODEV;

> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* If we need a PHY but no phy index is specified, fallback
> +			 * to dev->phydev
> +			 */
> +			phydev = dev->phydev;
> +		}
> +	}

else if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_PHY_INDEX]) {
	NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR("can't target a PHY without a netdev")
	...

? just in case someone calls this with _phy policy and no dev required?