linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: update compatible name for match with driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ec81cbb5-30d9-4104-b59d-ae7cd2d90c48@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:58:36 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: update compatible name
 for match with driver

On 11/03/2024 10:43, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you forgot to update the example:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm4450-tlmm.example.dtb:
>>>>>> /example-0/pinctrl@...0000: failed to match any schema with
>>>>>> compatible: ['qcom,sm4450-tlmm']
>>>>>
>>>>> Still a warning in linux-next. Please send a fix.
>>>>
>>>> I understand it as applying 1/2 is the fix so I applied it.
>>>
>>> I will check this warning, and I will fix it.
>>
>> Now? We were all waiting for you to respond here without any effect, so
>> finally I asked Linus to take the patch. In the future, be responsible
>> for your patches and comments happening to them. The same if your
>> applied commit causes issues in the next.
> 
> I will speed up the upstream work of the sm4450.
> Before that, I had been focusing on the work of AIM300.

That's not what I was suggested. I don't care if you work on sm4450,
AIM300 or foo4567. It's about your merged commits and submitted patches.


Best regards,
Krzysztof