lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:43:35 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, 
	mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, 
	adrian.hunter@...el.com, eranian@...gle.com, ravi.bangoria@....com, 
	ananth.narayan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf vendor events amd: Add Zen 5 uncore events

On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:24 PM Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com> wrote:
>
> Add uncore events taken from Section 1.5 "L3 Cache Performance Monitor
> Counters" and Section 2 "UMC Performance Monitors" of the Performance
> Monitor Counters for AMD Family 1Ah Model 00h-0Fh Processors document
> available at the link below. This constitutes events which capture L3
> cache and UMC command activity.

Why do the L3 uncore PMU events go in the same topic as the core/cpu
events, but the memory controller events not? Could they both go in
separate files to make better use of the topic?

Thanks,
Ian

> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=305974
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
> ---
>  .../pmu-events/arch/x86/amdzen5/cache.json    | 175 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../arch/x86/amdzen5/memory-controller.json   | 101 ++++++++++

[ ... snip ... ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ