lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:18:45 +0200
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Eric Snowberg" <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Cc: "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
 "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>, "David Woodhouse"
 <dwmw2@...radead.org>, "herbert@...dor.apana.org.au"
 <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, "paul@...l-moore.com"
 <paul@...l-moore.com>, "jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
 "serge@...lyn.com" <serge@...lyn.com>, "zohar@...ux.ibm.com"
 <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, "roberto.sassu@...wei.com"
 <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, "dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com"
 <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>, "mic@...ikod.net" <mic@...ikod.net>,
 "casey@...aufler-ca.com" <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, "stefanb@...ux.ibm.com"
 <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "keyrings@...r.kernel.org"
 <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] certs: Introduce ability to link to a system
 key

On Mon Mar 11, 2024 at 11:31 PM EET, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 11, 2024, at 1:18 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon Mar 11, 2024 at 6:11 PM EET, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> >> + return -1;
> > 
> > Missed this one: why a magic number?
>
> Good point, I'll change this to return -ENOKEY.  Thanks.

Either that or a boolean function, which ever fits to the overall
flow better... The upside of error code is less branching in the call
sites. The upside of boolean is that caller exactly knows all the
values that ever should come out as a result.

Your choice ofc.

BR, Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ