linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdad2198-5d3a-4bce-8249-8b2f9f75f84a@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:42:18 -0500
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 michal.simek@....com, ben.levinsky@....com
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled
 Memory (TCM) bindings



On 3/12/24 7:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/03/2024 18:59, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> From: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
>> 
>> Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq
>> UltraScale+ platform. It will help in defining TCM in device-tree
>> and make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven.
>> 
>> Tightly-coupled memories(TCMs) are low-latency memory that provides
>> predictable instruction execution and predictable data load/store
>> timing. Each Cortex-R5F processor contains two 64-bit wide 64 KB memory
>> banks on the ATCM and BTCM ports, for a total of 128 KB of memory.
>> 
>> The TCM resources(reg, reg-names and power-domain) are documented for
>> each TCM in the R5 node. The reg and reg-names are made as required
>> properties as we don't want to hardcode TCM addresses for future
>> platforms and for zu+ legacy implementation will ensure that the
>> old dts w/o reg/reg-names works and stable ABI is maintained.
>> 
>> It also extends the examples for TCM split and lockstep modes.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
>> ---
>> 
>> Changes in v13:
>>   - Have power-domains property for lockstep case instead of
>>     keeping it flexible.
>>   - Add "items:" list in power-domains property
> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for RB. I provided explanation of flexible power-domains in
previous patchset. I am happy to send new revision removing
minItems if you dis-agree.

Thanks.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>