[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfH3P9dTiBHpjN5b@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:58:07 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@...il.com,
mazziesaccount@...il.com, ak@...klinger.de,
petre.rodan@...dimension.ro, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
phil@...pberrypi.com, 579lpy@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: pressure: Add triggered buffer support for
BMP280 driver
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:40:07PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> Add a buffer struct that will hold the values of the measurements
> and will be pushed to userspace and a buffer_handler function to
> read the data and push them.
..
> + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev,
dev here
> + iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> + &bmp280_buffer_handler, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(data->dev, ret,
data->dev here
Are they the same? If not, why this difference?
> + "iio triggered buffer setup failed\n");
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists