[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfH4IyeFTGFBKT4J@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:01:55 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@...il.com,
mazziesaccount@...il.com, ak@...klinger.de,
petre.rodan@...dimension.ro, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
phil@...pberrypi.com, 579lpy@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: pressure: Simplify read_* functions
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
In the Subject: ... read_*() functions
> Add the coefficients for the IIO standard units inside the chip_info
> structure.
>
> Remove the calculations with the coefficients for the IIO compatibility
> from inside the read_(temp/press/humid) functions and move it to the
read_{temp,press,humid}()
> read_raw function.
read_raw()
> Execute the calculations with the coefficients inside the read_raw
read_raw()
> oneshot capture functions.
>
> Also fix raw_* and comp_* values signs.
..
> case IIO_TEMP:
> - ret = data->chip_info->read_temp(data, val, val2);
> + ret = data->chip_info->read_temp(data);
> + *val = data->chip_info->temp_coeffs[0] * ret;
> + *val2 = data->chip_info->temp_coeffs[1];
> + if (!strcmp(indio_dev->name, "bmp580"))
> + ret = IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
> + else
> + ret = IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
I'm wondering if we may replace these strcmp():s by using enum and respective
values in chip_info.
> break;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists