[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef972e0088964722adffc596d38b0463@paul-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:07:00 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io>, LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] LSM: use 32 bit compatible data types in LSM syscalls.
On Mar 13, 2024 Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> LSM: use 32 bit compatible data types in LSM syscalls.
>
> Change the size parameters in lsm_list_modules(), lsm_set_self_attr()
> and lsm_get_self_attr() from size_t to u32. This avoids the need to
> have different interfaces for 32 and 64 bit systems.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: a04a1198088a: ("LSM: syscalls for current process attributes")
> Fixes: ad4aff9ec25f: ("LSM: Create lsm_list_modules system call")
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> Reported-and-reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...ace.io>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/security.h | 8 ++++----
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 ++--
> security/lsm_syscalls.c | 10 +++++-----
> security/security.c | 12 ++++++------
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 ++--
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 4 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/lsm/common.h | 6 +++---
> tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_get_self_attr_test.c | 10 +++++-----
> tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c | 8 ++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c | 6 +++---
> 11 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
Okay, this looks better, I'm going to merge this into lsm/stable-6.9
and put it through the usual automated testing as well as a kselftest
run to make sure everything there is still okay. Assuming all goes
well and no one raises any objections, I'll likely send this up to
Linus tomorrow.
Thanks everyone!
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists