[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTkvyWpvkejbFf-VJoTvUKVDGxBDYkKFdNrdgq4jy5i_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:37:30 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] LSM: use 32 bit compatible data types in LSM syscalls.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 4:07 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2024 Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >
> > LSM: use 32 bit compatible data types in LSM syscalls.
> >
> > Change the size parameters in lsm_list_modules(), lsm_set_self_attr()
> > and lsm_get_self_attr() from size_t to u32. This avoids the need to
> > have different interfaces for 32 and 64 bit systems.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Fixes: a04a1198088a: ("LSM: syscalls for current process attributes")
> > Fixes: ad4aff9ec25f: ("LSM: Create lsm_list_modules system call")
> > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> > Reported-and-reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...ace.io>
> > ---
> > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/security.h | 8 ++++----
> > security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 ++--
> > security/lsm_syscalls.c | 10 +++++-----
> > security/security.c | 12 ++++++------
> > security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 ++--
> > security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 4 ++--
> > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/common.h | 6 +++---
> > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_get_self_attr_test.c | 10 +++++-----
> > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c | 8 ++++----
> > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c | 6 +++---
> > 11 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> Okay, this looks better, I'm going to merge this into lsm/stable-6.9
> and put it through the usual automated testing as well as a kselftest
> run to make sure everything there is still okay. Assuming all goes
> well and no one raises any objections, I'll likely send this up to
> Linus tomorrow.
>
> Thanks everyone!
Unfortunately it looks like we have a kselftest failure (below). I'm
pretty sure that this was working at some point, but it's possible I
missed it when I ran the selftests previously. I've got to break for
a personal appt right now, but I'll dig into this later tonight.
# timeout set to 45
# selftests: lsm: lsm_get_self_attr_test
# TAP version 13
# 1..6
# # Starting 6 tests from 1 test cases.
# # RUN global.size_null_lsm_get_self_attr ...
# # OK global.size_null_lsm_get_self_attr
# ok 1 global.size_null_lsm_get_self_attr
# # RUN global.ctx_null_lsm_get_self_attr ...
# # lsm_get_self_attr_test.c:49:ctx_null_lsm_get_self_attr:Expected -1 (-1) != r
c (-1)
# # ctx_null_lsm_get_self_attr: Test terminated by assertion
# # FAIL global.ctx_null_lsm_get_self_attr
# not ok 2 global.ctx_null_lsm_get_self_attr
# # RUN global.size_too_small_lsm_get_self_attr ...
# # OK global.size_too_small_lsm_get_self_attr
# ok 3 global.size_too_small_lsm_get_self_attr
# # RUN global.flags_zero_lsm_get_self_attr ...
# # OK global.flags_zero_lsm_get_self_attr
# ok 4 global.flags_zero_lsm_get_self_attr
# # RUN global.flags_overset_lsm_get_self_attr ...
# # OK global.flags_overset_lsm_get_self_attr
# ok 5 global.flags_overset_lsm_get_self_attr
# # RUN global.basic_lsm_get_self_attr ...
# # OK global.basic_lsm_get_self_attr
# ok 6 global.basic_lsm_get_self_attr
# # FAILED: 5 / 6 tests passed.
# # Totals: pass:5 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
not ok 1 selftests: lsm: lsm_get_self_attr_test # exit=1
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists