linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf docs: arm_spe: Clarify more SPE requirements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:41:54 +0000
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf docs: arm_spe: Clarify more SPE requirements



On 12/03/2024 19:56, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 6:25 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>>
>> The question of exactly when KPTI needs to be disabled comes up a lot
>> because it doesn't always need to be done. Add the relevant kernel
>> function and some examples that describe the behavior.
>>
>> Also describe the interrupt requirement and that no error message will
>> be printed if this isn't met.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 

Thanks for the review

>> ---
>>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-arm-spe.txt | 12 +++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-arm-spe.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-arm-spe.txt
>> index bf03222e9a68..0a3eda482307 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-arm-spe.txt
>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-arm-spe.txt
>> @@ -116,6 +116,15 @@ Depending on CPU model, the kernel may need to be booted with page table isolati
>>  (kpti=off). If KPTI needs to be disabled, this will fail with a console message "profiling buffer
>>  inaccessible. Try passing 'kpti=off' on the kernel command line".
>>
>> +For the full criteria that determine whether KPTI needs to be forced off or not, see function
>> +unmap_kernel_at_el0() in the kernel sources. Common cases where it's not required
>> +are on the CPUs in kpti_safe_list, or on Arm v8.5+ where FEAT_E0PD is mandatory.
>> +
>> +The SPE interrupt must also be described by the firmware. If the module is loaded and KPTI is
>> +disabled (or isn't required to be disabled) but the SPE PMU still doesn't show in
>> +/sys/bus/event_source/devices/, then it's possible that the SPE interrupt isn't described by
>> +ACPI or DT. In this case no warning will be printed by the driver.
>> +
>>  Capturing SPE with perf command-line tools
>>  ------------------------------------------
>>
>> @@ -199,7 +208,8 @@ Common errors
>>
>>   - "Cannot find PMU `arm_spe'. Missing kernel support?"
>>
>> -   Module not built or loaded, KPTI not disabled (see above), or running on a VM
>> +   Module not built or loaded, KPTI not disabled, interrupt not described by firmware,
>> +   or running on a VM. See 'Kernel Requirements' above.
>>
>>   - "Arm SPE CONTEXT packets not found in the traces."
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>