linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] dmaengine: bcm2835: Fix several spellos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:26:00 +0100
From: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com, Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
	Dom Cobley <popcornmix@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] dmaengine: bcm2835: Fix several spellos

On 08:00 Wed 13 Mar     , Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/13/2024 7:08 AM, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> > Fixed Codespell reported warnings about spelling and coding convention
> > violations, among which there are also a couple potential operator
> > precedence issue in macroes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
> 
> There are no spelling errors being fixed in this commit, this is purely
> stylistic and conforming to the Linux coding style guidelines.

-	/* detect a size missmatch */
-	if (buf_len && (d->size != buf_len))
+	/* detect a size mismatch */
+	if (buf_len && d->size != buf_len)

Isn't 'missmatch' a spelling error? Maybe I can drop the word 'several', since it's
indeed only one...

> -- 
> Florian

Many thanks,
Andrea