[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240313022219.GC1148@sol.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:22:19 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
v-songbaohua@...o.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto tree
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:12:11PM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> > The only user of comp_alg_common was the crypto stats, and it was introduced by
> > a refactoring of the crypto stats (commit 0a742389bcc0, "crypto: acomp - Count
> > error stats differently"), so it seems appropriate to remove it for now.
> >
> > If you could go through my patch and explain what other unused code related to
> > the crypto stats you might consider to be "infrastructure" that should not be
> > removed, that would be helpful.
>
> Hi Eric,
> that user is mm/zswap [1], apologize it was not in crypto tree. I guess you might
> just need a new version to keep that one :-)
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240222081135.173040-2-21cnbao@gmail.com/
>
That code is just reading the algorithm flags, which exist regardless of whether
struct comp_alg_common does or not. The exact way to get at those flags just
changes slightly.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists