[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240314093548.sVPg_3b9@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:35:48 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf: Enqueue SIGTRAP always via task_work.
On 2024-03-13 15:41:18 [+0100], Marco Elver wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index c7a0274c662c8..e9926baaa1587 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -9592,14 +9572,17 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
> >
> > if (regs)
> > pending_id = hash32_ptr((void *)instruction_pointer(regs)) ?: 1;
> > - if (!event->pending_sigtrap) {
> > - event->pending_sigtrap = pending_id;
> > + if (!event->pending_work) {
> > + event->pending_work = pending_id;
> > local_inc(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> > - irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq);
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event->refcount));
> > + task_work_add(current, &event->pending_task, TWA_RESUME);
> > + if (in_nmi())
> > + irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq);
>
> Some brief code comments here would help having to dig through git
> history to understand this.
Sure.
> > } else if (event->attr.exclude_kernel && valid_sample) {
> > /*
> > * Should not be able to return to user space without
> > - * consuming pending_sigtrap; with exceptions:
> > + * consuming pending_work; with exceptions:
> > *
> > * 1. Where !exclude_kernel, events can overflow again
> > * in the kernel without returning to user space.
> > @@ -13049,6 +13032,13 @@ static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event)
> > &parent_event->child_total_time_running);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool task_work_cb_match(struct callback_head *cb, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct perf_event *event = container_of(cb, struct perf_event, pending_task);
> > +
> > + return event == data;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void
> > perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> > {
> > @@ -13088,6 +13078,11 @@ perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> > * Kick perf_poll() for is_event_hup();
> > */
> > perf_event_wakeup(parent_event);
> > + if (event->pending_work &&
> > + task_work_cancel_match(current, task_work_cb_match, event)) {
>
> Brief comment which case this covers would be good.
Okay.
> > + put_event(event);
> > + local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> > + }
> > free_event(event);
> > put_event(parent_event);
> > return;
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists