[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfMK_yTzxTQCMGZ1@x1>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:34:39 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work
on RT.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:10:33AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-03-13 17:14:25 [-0300], Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > tldr; No dmesg activity, no kernel splats, most tests passed, nothing
> > > noticeable when running with/without the patch with Vince's regression
> > > tests. So:
> >
> > > Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> > > Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> >
> > Too quick, now I'm testing it on top of torvalds/master, no PREEMPT_RT.
>
> Just to be clear: You revert your Tested-by because now you test this on
> torvalds/master but not because you reported a regression which I
> missed.
You got it right. No regressions, the code is good, I just need to test
it a bit further, with torvalds/master, without PREEMPT_RT.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists