linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: renesas: r9a08g045: Add support for power domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:01:15 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, magnus.damm@...il.com, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: renesas: r9a08g045: Add support for power domains

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 3:07 PM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev> wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>
> Instantiate power domains for the currently enabled IPs of R9A08G045 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> ---
>
> Change in v2:
> - used DEF_REG_CONF() to describe register offests and bits
> - updated MSTOP bitmask for ddr domain
> - updated MSTOP config for oftde_ddr
> - kept the same description for gic as the CPG_BUS_ACPU_MSTOP register
>   documentation in the latest HW manual version is wrong and it will be
>   fixed; proper description for GIC is located in "Registers for Module
>   Standby Mode" table
> - haven't added watchdog domain (was missing in v1, too, by mistake) as
>   the watchdog restart handler will fail w/o patch [1]; with this pm domain
>   support the watchdog will fail to probe; not sure what is the best
>   option until [1] will be integrated
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20240228083253.2640997-10-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com

I guess we'll have to wait until that dependency is integrated,
or use an immutable branch?

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds