[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240314164801.GQ935089@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:48:01 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
chen.bo@...el.com, hang.yuan@...el.com, tina.zhang@...el.com,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, isaku.yamahata@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 027/130] KVM: TDX: Define TDX architectural
definitions
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 03:30:43PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > +#define TDX_TD_ATTRIBUTE_DEBUG BIT_ULL(0)
> > +#define TDX_TD_ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE BIT_ULL(28)
> It's better to align the style of the naming.
>
> Either use TDX_TD_ATTR_* or TDX_TD_ATTRIBUTE_*?
Good point. I'll adopt TDX_TD_ATTR_* because TDX_TD_ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE is
already long.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists