[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfMqWP-t39SCvkA2@pluto>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:48:24 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
protocol basic support
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 09:35:17PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> Since SCMI 3.2 Spec is released, and this patchset has got R-b/T-b,
> is it ok to land this patchset?
>
I'll have a look at this last version and a spin on my test setup.
..but has this V5 change at all since the Reviewed-by tags due to the
latest spec changes ?
..IOW does this V5 include the latest small bits spec-changes or those
latest gpio-related spec-changes are just not needed at the level of the Linux
pinctrl support as of now and can be added later on when a Linux gpio
driver will be built on top of this ?
Thanks,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists