linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:31:51 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
	<peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>, Linus
 Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha
 Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
	<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, dl-linux-imx
	<linux-imx@....com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
 protocol basic support

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
> protocol basic support
> 
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 09:35:17PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > Since SCMI 3.2 Spec is released, and this patchset has got R-b/T-b, is
> > it ok to land this patchset?
> >
> 
> I'll have a look at this last version and a spin on my test setup.
> 
> ...but has this V5 change at all since the Reviewed-by tags due to the latest
> spec changes ?

The tags are same as V4. I only did a rebase, no more changes.
> 
> ...IOW does this V5 include the latest small bits spec-changes or those latest
> gpio-related spec-changes are just not needed at the level of the Linux pinctrl
> support as of now and can be added later on when a Linux gpio driver will be
> built on top of this ?

In my current test, I no need the gpio related changes, so I would add that later
if you are ok.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Thanks,
> Cristian