lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfRf36u7CH7bIEZ7@yuki>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:03 +0100
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com, ltp@...ts.linux.it,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] [linus:master] [pidfd]  cb12fd8e0d: ltp.readahead01.fail

Hi!
> So I'd just remove that test. It's meaningless for pseudo fses.

Wouldn't it make more sense to actually return EINVAL instead of
ignoring the request if readahead() is not implemented?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@...e.cz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ