[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PN3PR01MB10135290B74FD411720E431989A282@PN3PR01MB10135.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:02:34 +0000
From: Himanshu Bhavani <himanshu.bhavani@...iconsignals.io>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Lorenz
Brun <lorenz@...n.one>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add &gmac2phy in rk3328-rock64
Hello Simic,
>Unfortunately, this isn't an acceptable change to the Rock64 dts file.
>Yes, there's the second built-in Ethernet interface in the RK3328 SoC,
>but the Rock64 layout doesn't expose it as a separate physical network
>interface, i.e. it isn't available as a port.
I was wondering if the Rock64 lacks a port.
According to this link: https://pine64.org/devices/rock64/,
it seems that there is a physical network interface available on the sbc.
>Such a change would be fine to be applied to the dts by hand, by someone
>who actually adds a second physical network port to their Rock64.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists