[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240318101037.15c93b28@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:10:37 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Huacai
Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Tiezhu Yang
<yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch
tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:09:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/loongarch/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 853f96367535 ("LoongArch: Add kernel livepatching support")
>
> from the loongarch tree and commit:
>
> f48212ee8e78 ("treewide: remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM")
>
> from the kvm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 99a0a15ce5f7,eb2139387a54..000000000000
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@@ -133,11 -133,8 +133,10 @@@ config LOONGARC
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> - select HAVE_KVM
> + select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
> select HAVE_NMI
> + select HAVE_OBJTOOL if AS_HAS_EXPLICIT_RELOCS
> select HAVE_PCI
> select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> select HAVE_PERF_REGS
This is now a conflict between the loongarch tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists