lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:10:37 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Huacai
 Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Tiezhu Yang
 <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch
 tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:09:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   853f96367535 ("LoongArch: Add kernel livepatching support")
> 
> from the loongarch tree and commit:
> 
>   f48212ee8e78 ("treewide: remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 99a0a15ce5f7,eb2139387a54..000000000000
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@@ -133,11 -133,8 +133,10 @@@ config LOONGARC
>   	select HAVE_KPROBES
>   	select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
>   	select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> - 	select HAVE_KVM
>  +	select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
>   	select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
>   	select HAVE_NMI
>  +	select HAVE_OBJTOOL if AS_HAS_EXPLICIT_RELOCS
>   	select HAVE_PCI
>   	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
>   	select HAVE_PERF_REGS

This is now a conflict between the loongarch tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ