linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] wifi: ti: Convert sprintf/snprintf to sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:05:04 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
  "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] wifi: ti: Convert sprintf/snprintf to sysfs_emit

"Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com> writes:

> Kalle,
>
>
> On 18/03/2024 17:16, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Per filesystems/sysfs.rst, show() should only use sysfs_emit()
>>> or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the value to be returned to user space.
>>>
>>> coccinelle complains that there are still a couple of functions that use
>>> snprintf(). Convert them to sysfs_emit().
>>>
>>> sprintf() will be converted as weel if they have.
>>>
>>> Generally, this patch is generated by
>>> make coccicheck M=<path/to/file> MODE=patch \
>>> COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/api/device_attr_show.cocci
>>>
>>> No functional change intended
>>>
>>> CC: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
>>> CC: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> V2: subject updated
>>>
>>> This is a part of the work "Fix coccicheck device_attr_show warnings"[1]
>>> Split them per subsystem so that the maintainer can review it easily
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240116041129.3937800-1-lizhijian@fujitsu.com/
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
>> 
>> Please resubmit the whole patchset as v3.
>
>
> May I know what's wrong with this V2? or what update should I do in V3

Sorry, my mistake. I didn't see patch 1 and I assumed it was not sent.
But I checked patchwork now and I do see all three patches:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=835497

So no need to resend anything because of this.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches