[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240318151631.1621881-3-d-gole@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:46:33 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel
Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Dhruva
Gole <d-gole@...com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] PM: wakeup: Remove unnecessary else from device_init_wakeup
Checkpatch warns that else is generally not necessary after a return
condition which exists in the if part of this function. Hence, just to
abide by what checkpatch recommends, follow it's guidelines.
Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
---
include/linux/pm_wakeup.h | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
index 428803eed798..76cd1f9f1365 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
@@ -234,11 +234,10 @@ static inline int device_init_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool enable)
if (enable) {
device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
return device_wakeup_enable(dev);
- } else {
- device_wakeup_disable(dev);
- device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
- return 0;
}
+ device_wakeup_disable(dev);
+ device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
+ return 0;
}
#endif /* _LINUX_PM_WAKEUP_H */
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists