lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240318151839.okplnfpakp5y5lxj@dhruva>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:48:39 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Adrian Hunter
	<adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Len Brown
	<len.brown@...el.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PM: wakeup: Remove unnecessary else from
 device_init_wakeup

On Mar 18, 2024 at 14:52:02 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:55 AM Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com> wrote:
> >
> > Checkpatch warns that else is generally not necessary after a return
> > condition which exists in the if part of this function. Hence, just to
> > abide by what checkpatch recommends, follow it's guidelines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/pm_wakeup.h | 7 +++----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > index 428803eed798..76cd1f9f1365 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > @@ -234,11 +234,10 @@ static inline int device_init_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool enable)
> >         if (enable) {
> >                 device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
> >                 return device_wakeup_enable(dev);
> > -       } else {
> > -               device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> > -               device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
> > -               return 0;
> >         }
> > +       device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> > +       device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
> > +       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  #endif /* _LINUX_PM_WAKEUP_H */
> > --
> 
> This one is fine with me, but not 6.9-rc material.

OK, I completely understand.

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ