linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: Remove fsl,t1023-sfp in favor of fsl,layerscape-sfp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:40:45 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Richard Alpe <richard@...42.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
	Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: Remove fsl,t1023-sfp in favor of
 fsl,layerscape-sfp

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:08:00AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 3/17/24 11:10, Conor Dooley wrote:

> > Additionally, should
> > they fall back to t1023-sfp? I see that there's already some dts files
> > with these compatibles in them but seemingly no driver support as there
> > is for the t1023-sfp.
> 
> I checked the reference manuals for these processors, and all of them use TA 2.0.

Sounds like a fallback is suitable then, although that will require
updating the various dts files.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)