linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: media: cnm,wave521c: drop resets restriction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d3376204-0861-449f-b043-7a27e18d3eba@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:41:16 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@...il.com>, Nas Chung
 <nas.chung@...psnmedia.com>, Jackson Lee <jackson.lee@...psnmedia.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: media: cnm,wave521c: drop resets
 restriction

On 18/03/2024 15:42, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> Different designs may have different amount of routed reset signals.

You changed nothing. This commit msg does not match code at all. I don't
understand this.

And your subject is entirely wrong - again, you did not drop any
restriction.

But in general: we expect restrictions (constraints).

> Drop maxItems restriction, add a small description instead.


Best regards,
Krzysztof