lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7bb388b-2c4c-4102-9b84-278f6c6855ee@hatter.bewilderbeest.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:37:45 -0700
From: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
	Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Stefan Roesch <shr@...kernel.io>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, Sam James <sam@...too.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] prctl: Generalize PR_SET_MDWE support check
 to be per-arch

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:53:59AM PST, Helge Deller wrote:
>On 2/27/24 11:24, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:35:41PM -0800, Zev Weiss wrote:
>>>There exist systems other than PARISC where MDWE may not be feasible
>>>to support; rather than cluttering up the generic code with additional
>>>arch-specific logic let's add a generic function for checking MDWE
>>>support and allow each arch to override it as needed.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
>>>Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v6.3+
>>
>>PA-RISC folk need to ack/review-by this patch.
>
>I'm fine with patch 1/2:
>Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de> # parisc
>
>>Alternatively, it needs
>>to be restructured to add the arch_memory_deny_write_exec_supported()
>>override without touching the PA-RISC code, which then makes the Arm
>>patch independent of the status of the PA-RISC patch. That will allow
>>the Arm issue to be solved even if an ack is not forthcoming for the
>>PA-RISC parts.
>>>Alternatively, I wonder whether akpm would be willing to pick up this
>>patch set as-is.
>
>I have no preference, but I think both patches should be pushed
>together via arm tree or akpm.
>
>Helge

Ping...Russell, Andrew, any thoughts on how this could move forward?


Thanks,
Zev


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ