[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <010e4742-438f-413f-811f-a033ec104832@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:22:23 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Validate
'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names'
On 19/03/2024 07:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/03/2024 18:21, Prabhakar wrote:
>> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>>
>> Add support to validate the 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names' properties
>> for every supported SoC. This ensures proper handling and configuration of
>> interrupt-related properties across supported platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>> ---
>> v2->v3
>> - Listed interrupts and interrupt-names for every SoC in if check
>> ---
>> .../bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml | 95 ++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
>> index af72c3420453..53f18e9810fd 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
>> @@ -82,38 +82,6 @@ properties:
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> - interrupts:
>
> I don't understand what is happening with this patchset. Interrupts must
> stay here. Where did you receive any different feedback?
Look how it is done:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml#L44
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists