[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe7f271c-1e16-4aff-8d72-4c9e9b2bc2b2@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:39:56 -0500
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
michal.simek@....com, ben.levinsky@....com
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Versal platform support
On 3/17/24 1:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/03/2024 22:15, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> AMD-Xilinx Versal platform is successor of ZynqMP platform. Real-time
>> Processor Unit R5 cluster IP on Versal is same as of ZynqMP Platform.
>> Only difference is power-domains ID needed by power management firmware.
>> Hence, keeping the compatible property same as of zynqmp node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
>
> There is no binding change, so NAK. Platform is not being added to
> examples. You changed nothing in Versal support...
Thanks for reviews.
Okay got it. That means I don't really need to add anything related to Versal.
I will get rid of patch that says "Versal support". Looks like it's not needed
at all.
Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists