[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4ACBB9C7-EFF5-47CA-9A8A-114209AE7953@yotsuba.nl>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:33:17 +0100
From: Mark <mark@...suba.nl>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] netpoll: support sending over raw IP
interfaces
Hi Ratheesh,
> Op 18 mrt 6 Reiwa, om 15:06 heeft Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> […]
> Is below network topology possible ?
> Netpoll()- ------> netdev A ----> raw interface
> Where netdev A's netdev->header_ops != NULL
I believe so, this is not uncommon in tunnel devices like gretap.
However, those fully encapsulate the link layer header in the packet
to the lower interface. I am not aware of a interface driver that removes
a header upon xmit, so to speak. However, I have just posted a v2 that
instead uses the documented `dev_has_header()` API, which seems to fit the
check exactly, here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240321122003.20089-1-mark@yotsuba.nl/T/
I hope this change manages to mitigate your concerns. :-)
> […]
Thanks and regards,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists