lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:41:26 +0800
From: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
Cc: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
 "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 8/9] fs: inotify: delete these unnecessary
 static variables it_zero and it_int_max



On 2024/3/21 19:38, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 21-03-24 11:55:55, Joel Granados wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:36:03AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> On Tue 19-03-24 23:57:49, wenyang.linux@...mail.com wrote:
>>>> From: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Delete unnecessary static variables (it_zero and it_int_max)
>>>> and encode them directly in the table entry.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>
>>>> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>>> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>> Cc: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
>>>> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>>>> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>
>>> This looks as a sensible cleanup but I don't see the first patch in the
>>> series (and neither it is archived at lore.kernel.org) so I cannot really
>>> verify whether your conversion is correct...
>> This was my original comment. If you want to see the cover letter
>> look for this mail ID tencent_06797E65CFC655DCD4F0414B9380E95ECC08@...com
>>
>> Not sure why it separates the cover letter from the rest of the patches.
> 
> No, that is actually a different email :) Based on lore the message ID
> should be:
> 26c450f6467b4cbaf94cdb10f047abc6ab0c2a5d.1710863674.git.wenyang.linux@...mail.com
> 
> but the email is not in the archive...
> 
> 								Honza

Sorry, my email box changed the message ID when sending, but it can be 
found in lcore:


or
https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_0D6ABA209A4980742DE6003FBFE7FE2A3207@qq.com/


If it causes any inconvenience to you, I can resend it. After some 
experiments, I have finally found a way to send them in a thread.

--
Best wishes,
Wen






Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ