[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zfxk9aFhF7O_-T3c@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:48:53 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
mgorman@...e.de, dave@...olabs.net, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, corbet@....net,
void@...ifault.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com,
tj@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, vvvvvv@...gle.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, glider@...gle.com,
elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
jbaron@...mai.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/37] mm: fix non-compound multi-order memory
accounting in __free_pages
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> static inline void pgalloc_tag_add(struct page *page, struct task_struct *task,
> unsigned int nr) {}
> static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub(struct page *page, unsigned int nr) {}
> static inline void pgalloc_tag_split(struct page *page, unsigned int nr) {}
> +static inline struct alloc_tag *pgalloc_tag_get(struct page *page) { return NULL; }
> +static inline void pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(struct alloc_tag *tag, unsigned int nr) {}
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING */
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index fd1cc5b80a56..00e0ae4cbf2d 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4700,12 +4700,15 @@ void __free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> /* get PageHead before we drop reference */
> int head = PageHead(page);
> + struct alloc_tag *tag = pgalloc_tag_get(page);
>
> if (put_page_testzero(page))
> free_the_page(page, order);
> - else if (!head)
> + else if (!head) {
> + pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1);
> while (order-- > 0)
> free_the_page(page + (1 << order), order);
> + }
Why do you need these new functions instead of just:
+ else if (!head) {
+ pgalloc_tag_sub(page, (1 << order) - 1);
while (order-- > 0)
free_the_page(page + (1 << order), order);
+ }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists