[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <839a7448-b958-402e-862a-fc3f7d86e797@linux.dev>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 02:30:08 +0800
From: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: Implement device_get_match_data fwnode
callback
Hi,
On 2024/3/23 02:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 02:12:14AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>> On 2024/3/23 02:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Besides that, the kernel project rule is "we do not add
>>> the dead (unused) code".
>> This rule is good an correct and I admit.
>>
>> But the problem is that it is chicken-and-egg problem,
>> it probably have at least two user now.
> Then show them! Convert in the same series and show that.
I believe that Vladimir has show enough to you. I have read that thread,
I think Vladimit have explained very well.
--
Best regards,
Sui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists