[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgF_GRPHcdiDyxvX@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:41:45 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: Implement device_get_match_data fwnode
callback
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 02:30:08AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> On 2024/3/23 02:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 02:12:14AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > > On 2024/3/23 02:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Besides that, the kernel project rule is "we do not add
> > > > the dead (unused) code".
> > > This rule is good an correct and I admit.
> > >
> > > But the problem is that it is chicken-and-egg problem,
> > > it probably have at least two user now.
> > Then show them! Convert in the same series and show that.
>
> I believe that Vladimir has show enough to you. I have read that thread,
> I think Vladimit have explained very well.
Let's continue there. I replied there just now.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists