[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7cd6768d-780c-4cdb-8091-c7a161eab23e@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:44:03 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,pmic-typec: drop port
description
On 22/03/2024 15:49, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> It's true that we don't describe CC lines. However In most of the
> cases CC lines are handled by the Type-C port manager directly. So
> there will be a connection from usb-c-connector to the pmic-typec
> itself (which looks pretty redundant).
I think it more logical to associate the role-switch event with the CC
lines which actually handle the messaging than the HS PHY which does not
to be honest.
If we predicate a name change on fixing the namespace then we should fix
the namespace instead of reuse existing for expediency.
$0.02
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists