linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,pmic-typec: drop port description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 00:31:58 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,pmic-typec: drop port description

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 22:44, Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 22/03/2024 15:49, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > It's true that we don't describe CC lines. However In most of the
> > cases CC lines are handled by the Type-C port manager directly. So
> > there will be a connection from usb-c-connector to the pmic-typec
> > itself (which looks pretty redundant).
>
> I think it more logical to associate the role-switch event with the CC
> lines which actually handle the messaging than the HS PHY which does not
> to be honest.
>
> If we predicate a name change on fixing the namespace then we should fix
> the namespace instead of reuse existing for expediency.

It's not an HS PHY. It is an HS host  = DWC3. Anyway, CC lines do not
go to the DWC3. They go directly to the PMIC.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry