linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zf2JKL075FnIxXGI@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:35:36 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	broonie@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, omosnace@...hat.com,
	paul@...l-moore.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com, jack@...e.cz,
	tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review

Hi!

> > > > > Marek Vasut (1):
> > > > >     regmap: Add bulk read/write callbacks into regmap_config
> > > > 
> > > > This one quite intrusive for the stable. Plus, at least "regmap: Add
> > > > missing map->bus check" is marked as fixing this one.
> > > 
> > > If there is no very good reason to include that regmap patch in stable
> > > backports, I would skip it, it is a feature patch. Does any backport depend
> > > on it ?
> > 
> > Well, yes and no.
> > 
> > Series of max310x patches depends on it:
> > 
> > !!a just a preparation; buggy, whole series for fixing this |ef8537927 285e76 o: 5.10| serial: max
> > 310x: use regmap methods for SPI batch operations
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > !! whole series to fix corruption, which did not exist in 5.10 in the first place |57871c388 3f42b1 o: 5.10| serial: max310x: fix IO data corruption in batched
> > operations
> > 
> > But according to the 3f42b1, the bug did not exist in 5.10 in the
> > first place, so we got buggy 285e76 backported, and then fixes up-to
> > 3f42b1 applied to fix it up.
> 
> Then probably both max30x patches should be dropped/reverted and the regmap
> bulk callbacks also dropped ?

Agreed.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)